2025 African Fact-Checking Awards for Journalists in Africa

Deadline: June 7, 2025.

Entries for the 2025 African Fact-Checking Awards, the longest-running awards programme honouring fact-checking journalism by the media in Africa, are now open to journalists, journalism students, and professional fact-checkers – across the continent.

AWARD CATEGORIES

The awards have three categories, with honours going to a winner and a runner-up. The categories are:

  • Fact-Check of the Year by a Working Journalist 
  • Fact-Check of the Year by a Professional Fact-Checker
  • Fact-Check of the Year by a Student Journalist

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

  1. To qualify, entries must have been first published or broadcast in the period from 1 May 2024 to 7 June 2025.
  2. The fact-check should conclude that a claim about an important topic, originating in or relevant to Africa, is either misleading or wrong. 

BENEFITS

  1. The winners of the working journalist and professional fact-checker categories will each get a prize of US$3,000.
  2. The runners-up will receive $1,500.
  3. The winner of the student journalist category will be awarded $2,000, and the runner-up $1,000. 

JUDGING CRITERIA

  1. Significance: The significance for wider society of the claim/statement investigated. How much does the topic matter to society at large and how serious could the consequences be if the claim wasn’t fact-checked
  2. Testing: How was the claim tested against the available evidence? Fact-checkers must take a long, hard look at the claim/statement that was made. Fact-checking entails rigorously sifting through the publicly available evidence for and against the claim. This should be done in a way that is fair to the person or institution who made the claim and strict in assessing the evidence
  3. Presentation: How well does the piece present the evidence for and against the claim? A good fact-checking report is structured in such a way that it’s understandable and makes the topic accessible to the widest possible public.
  4. Impact: The impact that the fact-check had on public debate on the topic. Did it lead to a correction, did it have significant reach, or was it shared by other organisations or members of the media, for instance?

Find more information on the OFFICIAL LINK

error: Content is protected !!